Skip to main content

New technologies are radically advancing our freedoms, but they are also enabling unparalleled invasions of privacy. National and international laws have yet to catch up with the evolving need for privacy that comes with new digital technologies. Respect for individuals' autonomy, anonymous speech, and the right to free association must be balanced against legitimate concerns like law enforcement. EFF fights in the courts and Congress to maintain your privacy rights in the digital world, and works with partners around the globe to support the development of privacy-protecting technologies.

Your cell phone helps you keep in touch with friends and family, but it also makes it easier for the government to track your location.

Your Web searches about sensitive medical information might seem a secret between you and your search engine, but companies like Google are creating a treasure trove of personal information by logging your online activities, and making it potentially available to any party wielding enough cash or a subpoena.

And the next time you try to board a plane, watch out—you might be turned away after being mistakenly placed on a government watch list, or be forced to open your email in the security line.

Several governments have also chosen to use malware to engage in extra-legal spying or system sabotage for dissidents or non-citizens, all in the name of “national security.”

As privacy needs evolve, so too should our regulatory regimes. National governments must put legal checks in place to prevent abuse of state powers, and international bodies need to consider how a changing technological environment shapes security agencies’ best practices. Above all, we need to respect the rights of autonomy, anonymity, association, and expression that privacy makes possible, while also taking into account legitimate law enforcement concerns.

Read our work on privacy issues below, and join EFF to help support our efforts.

For information about the law and technology of government surveillance in the United States check out EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense project.

Privacy Highlights

Banner Graphic: 

Digital Privacy at the U.S. Border: Protecting the Data On Your Devices and In the Cloud

Digital Privacy at the U.S. Border:Protecting the Data On Your Devices and In the Cloudby Sophia Cope, Amul Kalia, Seth Schoen, and Adam SchwartzDownload the report as a PDF.EXECUTIVE SUMMARYأفادت الحكومة الأمريكية أن عدد حالات تفحص المحتويات الالكترونية على الحدود قد إزداد بمقدار خمسة أضعاف خلال سنة واحدة فقط،...

NSA Spying

The US government, with assistance from major telecommunications carriers including AT&T, has engaged in massive, illegal dragnet surveillance of the domestic communications and communications records of millions of ordinary Americans since at least 2001. Since this was first reported on by the press and discovered by the public in late...

Privacy Updates

fingers prepared to flick a small person with a megaphone off the screen

国会应放弃违宪的 TikTok 禁令

国会打着保护数据的幌子妄图不合理地禁止 TikTok 的计划再次卷土重来,这次推出了一项新的法案——《保护美国人免受外国敌对控制的应用程序侵害法案》(简称 H.R.7521),该法案已在国会中取得了相当危险的支持势头。这项两党合作立法于一周前在众议院提出,预计将在本周晚些时候经过投票后提交给参议院。一年前,美国各地的数字权利支持者成功阻止了联邦《限制法案》,该法案通常被称为“TikTok 禁令”法案(实际上远不止于此)。现在,我们必须对这项新的法案采取同样的行动。 TAKE ACTIONTELL CONGRESS: DON'T BAN TIKTOK首先,H.R.7521 将迫使 TikTok 在未来 180 天内寻找一个总部位于非敌对国家/地区的新的所有者,否则将被禁止,直至满足上述条件。该法案同时会向总统赋予权力,将其他由被视为美国敌对国家/地区控制的应用程序认定为国家安全威胁。一旦被视为国家安全威胁,相关应用程序将被禁止在应用商店和网络托管服务中上架,除非在 180 天内与外国敌对国家/地区断绝一切关系。该法案将把通过应用商店或其他网络服务分发该应用程序,以及相关公司维护该应用程序的行为定为刑事犯罪。因此,该法案的最终结果是对 TikTok 实施全国禁令,或强制将该应用程序出售给其他公司。要解决这个无处不在的生态系统,唯一的办法是从一开始就禁止收集我们的数据。别搞错了——尽管这项法案一开始针对的是 TikTok,它可能会对其他方面产生影响。腾讯的微信应用程序是全球最大的独立即时通讯平台之一,拥有数十亿用户,也是海外华人的主要通信工具。它可能也是该法案的目标之一。 该法案的发起人认为,这些应用程序背后的公司可以获得和收集大量的私人数据,而且(从理论上讲)会与外国政府共享,因而使其成为国家安全威胁。但就像《限制法案》一样,这项法案并不能阻止这种数据共享,反而会削弱我们的网络权利。用户数据仍将被各种平台收集——甚至是强制出售后的 TikTok——并被出售给数据掮客,然后再转售给其他方,与现在的情况并无二致。 要解决这个无处不在的生态系统,唯一的办法是从一开始就禁止收集我们的数据。最终,除非这些公司被禁止收集、保留和销售这些数据,否则外国敌对国家/地区仍可通过社交媒体公司获取我们的数据。而且,需要明确的是,在我们现行的数据隐私法下,许多国内敌对势力也参与了具有操纵性和入侵性的数据收集活动。 这就是 EFF 支持此类消费者数据隐私立法原因。 国会还声称,这项法案能够解决 TikTok 借助算法向美国年轻人宣传反美内容的问题。这一理由和国家安全理由都引发了对第一修正案的严重担忧,上周 EFF、ACLU、CDT 和 Fight for the Future ...

Pages

Back to top

JavaScript license information